I would argue the AI model also made your message more wordy and less likely to be read by other humans.
But mostly, since you raise the question of value : I think your song serves as a cool novelty and gift to share, and I've been wanting to do this, so kudos to you.
However, the value of the song (as a cool novelty and as a gift) is likely going to plummet exponentially once we are submerged in a deluge of other stream-of-thought songs.
I believe that although there are use cases for fully-AI-generated content (a. as a novelty, b. as a quick throwaway business case), people actively don't want to
- talk to bots
- watch/read/listen to AI-generated content if it's labeled as such
That's why we chose (as an AI company working on video) to not provide video-generation features (only video editing from actual footage)... because I think it'll be less likely to catch on than you'd imagine at first glance.
You are making some broad generalisations. I had a conversation with ChatGPT this morning while exercising. Enjoyed it as much as listening to a podcast.
But mostly, since you raise the question of value : I think your song serves as a cool novelty and gift to share, and I've been wanting to do this, so kudos to you.
However, the value of the song (as a cool novelty and as a gift) is likely going to plummet exponentially once we are submerged in a deluge of other stream-of-thought songs.
I believe that although there are use cases for fully-AI-generated content (a. as a novelty, b. as a quick throwaway business case), people actively don't want to - talk to bots - watch/read/listen to AI-generated content if it's labeled as such
That's why we chose (as an AI company working on video) to not provide video-generation features (only video editing from actual footage)... because I think it'll be less likely to catch on than you'd imagine at first glance.